The Interview Room Archives

Classic Articles on Investigative Interviewing

For many years Stan B. Walters published The Interview Room, an international electronic magazine read by investigators, law enforcement professionals, and interview specialists around the world.

The articles in this archive explore investigative interviewing, interrogation strategy, deception detection, and behavioral analysis—ideas that helped challenge outdated assumptions and shape modern thinking in the field.

Confession Motivators: Gain or Pain

Citation: Originally published in The Interview Room
January 2008 (Volume 7, Number 1) — by Stan B. Walters.

For each of us, the only reason we change our minds about a decision that we have already made is when someone or something convinces us to abandon our first decision and a new or different point of view. In our mind in some measurable one when see the new position we have taken is being more rewarding or satisfying than the old. We have made the change after we have been motivated by our perception of "gain" or "pain." The same evaluation process is being made in the mind of our interview or interrogation subject while we are persuading them to change their current position and begin to cooperated with us and comply with our requests for information or even confession. If you can understand the "gain" or "pain" motivation of your subject and demonstrate to your subject a big distinction between the two, you'll have a better chance at gaining compliance, cooperation and confession.

In the Gain vs. Gain scenario, you subject has already concluded that he has much more to gain by remaining consistent with the position he has already assumed. First you have two hurdles to overcome, your subject's commitment to staying consistent with his decision and second demonstrating to him or her the position you want them to choose will provide them even more to gain than they may realize. In this case you'll need to acknowledge that you subject does have some things to gain by sticking with their decision and point out that the new point of view may also have those very same rewards. That it itself however, is not enough to move your subject. You'll have emphasize the advantages your subject has overlooked or has undervalued in terms of their importance to him and his "gain" objective.

In the second scenario which is Pain vs. Pain, there is the possibility that your interviewee has seen no gain for them at all by accepting your conclusions and you'll have a long road of persuasion ahead of you. It that case you'll need to demonstrate to the subject that they have overlooked some pain issues with their point of view and to accept your proposition. Your recommended position may also afford the subject some "pain" but not nearly as much as what they had not anticipated if they decided to "stand" by his initial choice. In most cases, carefully listening to your subject and their reasons for rejecting your proposal, you'll hear the gain-pain issue or issues that is driving your subject's resistance. You'll need to focus on those issues because their are important to your subject but may not be that important to you.

The final scenario is usually the easiest to deal with and that's the Pain vs. Gain format. In this case, it is much easier to convince your subject to abandon their choice to resist your recommendations to solve the issue. They already see themselves has having to deal with some level of "pain" as a result of their behavior and all you have to do is show them the "light" and get them to look forward and see to "gains" they can make by reevaluating their current pain-filled situation. In many cases, just pointing out what may be obvious "gain" to you is all that is needed because your subject is "blinded" by their current state and has missed the benefits of changing they judgment about the possible outcomes of cooperation.

In any of the three scenarios above, the interviewer has to realize that their subject is motivated by "their" perception of Gain vs Pain. The evaluation by the subject as to what they define as gain or pain may not even be close to what you as the interviewer think is worth gaining or avoiding. Once the interviewer recognizes their subject's gain or pain motivation he can key in on those issues. The greater the distinction you can make between Gain - Gain, Gain - Pain, and Pain - Pain, the more likely and the more quickly you'll get the subject to come to the conclusion to abandon their current preferred decision and accept the interviewer's recommendation.

© 2008 Stan B. Walters / Third Degree Publishing. All rights reserved.
This article is part of The Interview Room Archive Series, preserving classic writings on investigative interviewing and interrogation strategy.

Many of the concepts introduced in these early articles continue to evolve today through Stan Walters’ work on the Cognitive Reliability Framework and evidence-based interview practices.

Cognitive Reliability Framework

Interview and Interrogation Training:

The Real Difference …
Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation ® courses…
and “the others.”

The interview and interrogation training techniques and tactics you use…
could mean the difference between a solved case and a cold one.

“Just because we always have” is not a valid reason…

Years and years of using the same interview and interrogation technique that everyone has always used doesn’t mean it’s the best or the only one available. Legal changes, scientific studies of interview and interrogation and the results of those studies dictate that the professional investigative interviewer keep up with the current understanding of human behaviors in the interview room.

Will it stand?

Sure you got a statement and maybe a confession but will it withstand judicial scrutiny? In today’s judicial system, confessions are being challenged as to whether they are voluntary or in fact coerced or even false. Do you know the reason why the confession you got using “the same technique we’ve always used” may be tossed out of court along with your case?

Don’t Take Our Word For It!

Read some of the state and federal courts most recent rulings. Statements and confessions are being dismissed on a regular basis.

There are three main reasons for the rejections:

1. Three step accusatory techniques for interview and interrogation that have been taught and used for years.

Those techniques worked in the past… but not anymore.

2. Diagnosing a person as being deceptive using behaviors signs that have been proven scientifically to be erroneous.

3. Wrongly identifying a person as being a liar then proceeding with a three part accusatory technique dramatically increases the chances of false confessions.

Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation ® training courses dramatically reduce those risks!

A non-coercive and non-confrontational interview and interrogation technique...

Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation ® techniques have always been non-coercive and non-confrontational! Today some of the old methods have been modified and announce they are now non-coercive and non-confrontational. Why the change now after all these years?

Watch a short video on “Narrative-Based Interviewing”

The Truth About Lying

Every day you are faced with making very important decisions and the outcome depends on your ability to determine if someone has been truthful with you during interview and interrogation. It may be whether to hire a person for a job. It may be during the investigation of some incident or accident on the job or a crime in the community. Whether to make a large financial investment or allow someone access to your home or family. Should you always believe the victim or can you trust a witness?

How good are you really at spotting deception?

The reality is that the greatest majority of people can not accurately spot when someone is being truthful or deceptive. Research studies have shown we wrongly diagnose people as truthful or deceptive 50% of the time. That includes judges, law enforcement, doctors, therapists, counselors, teachers, media, parents – people just like you and I are notoriously bad at reading honesty in people. Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation ® relies on empirical evidence from behavioral experts studying the true signs of deception and exposing the myths that are regularly taught.

Check out our On-Demand course about the signs of deception

The Key To It All …

When you talk to someone and use the lie-spotting techniques you were told were foolproof, are you totally comfortable with your decision that the person is or is not being honest? The reality is that you and I are may be identifying another person’s behaviors as signs of lying when in fact they may be telling the truth. Does that make you wonder how many truthful people have been branded as liars or the number of innocent people wrongly accused? How many others have gotten away with their deception and victimized people like you or me?

See a video segment on False Confessions from National Geographic Channel Special
“Science of Interrogation” hosted by Stan B. Walters

What is stopping you from spotting a lie?

There are a number of reasons we miss deception or call a truthful person a liar. The most significant reason – for more than 50 years we have been taught to look for the wrong cues. Through the history of mankind, we have been looking at the wrong behaviors as indications of deceit. Today the results of modern research discovered what are more reliable signs of deception but we have not been told how to spot those signs. How could you protect yourself in the future or discover the real truth if you knew the difference between the signs of honesty and deception?

It May Not Be Very Important…

Perhaps determining if a person is or is not being totally honest is not important in making the right decision. Getting to court and having an attorney tear into a voluntary statement made by a subject and challenge it as actually having been coerced is now happening on regular basis.

The choice is yours…

What would you like to see happen when you or your staff conduct their interviews? How soon would you like to be successful at discovering the truth and identifying honest people? What is really stopping you from being a great interviewer and consistent at spotting deception and uncovering the truth? You want to get to the truth as quickly as possible. Cooperative victims, witnesses and customers should not be alienated by your approach or tactics. When the interview is completed you want to be sure that you have gotten all the critical information needed. Ultimately, you want to be sure that any incriminating statements or admissions obtained will be judged as voluntary and under non-coercive conditions.

Get your FREE eBook Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation: A Basic Guide

We have an interest in your success…

There certainly are numerously training programs you can try. Remember, you need scientifically based and legally tested techniques and that’s the heart of Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation ® training course content – the science! You are interested in techniques that are not based on 50 year old principles that have been shown to not produce consistent, reliable results. You want complete and accurate statements from all your subjects. You want to be confident that the interviews you conduct will survive a judicial review that they are voluntary and accurate and have not been coerced.

How You Can Participate…

Practical Kinesic Interview and Interrogation ® courses are for dedicated professionals who want to improve their interviewing and interrogation skills. Available for in-service or open registration courses, these top quality programs can be presented in various formats

– keynote, break-out sessions, one day overview, three day or even five day workshops.

Your Benefits of Hosting a Class for your Agency or Association

Call today to learn more about hosting a class